Hon. Diane Haddock See Rating Details
Associate Judge
District Court
Tarrant County
233rd
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.5 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Diane Haddock


Comments


Other

Comment #: TX482
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Incompetent.. Lazy. Does not concern herself with details such as evidence, documents or interpreting documents. Flies by the absolute seat of her pants. Wildly unpredictable and inconsistent.

Litigant

Comment #: TX335
Rating:1.0
Comments:
U have no idea what you're talking about you haven't been in this situation so you have no clue it has nothing to do with her being my girlfriend has to do with the facts the father hadn't seen the kid in two years and all the sudden wants to be a dad and does whatever he can to make her life miserable so I don't care how often U sit in a courtroom you don't know what's going on and if you did you would think totally different

Other

Comment #: TX331
Rating:10.0
Comments:
If you were a witness then you were excluded by The Rule so you really have no idea what was considered, further your statement is obviously biased in favor of your girlfriend. From someone that is in the court almost daily, Judge Haddock is a seasoned, intelligent, fair and considerate judge. I'll bet the other side of this case has an entirely different story.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: TX329
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was just recently in judge Haddocks courtroom and there was definitely a miscarriage of justice on that day I was there is a witness for my girlfriend in the case and never got to testify I had seen and heard many things that contradicted what was being said on the other side. how someone can call that justice is beyond me the judge had her mind made up before the case even started.it was a child custody case and I was appalled at the way it was done. the father had done everything to buy only the orders. Yet she lost the case The judge was arrogant pompous and didn't even listen to or look at the other evidence I always thought it was what was in the best interest of the child but in this case it definitely wasn't. its really sad In our society when people don't have the childs best interest win. you could not ask for a better mother
That she is to her child. I hope the judge Can sleep at night so I agree with the other person's comments.except this time it was a mother who got screwed

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: TX201
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Excellent judge and demeanor. Consistent over last 15 plus years

Litigant

Comment #: TX160
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Men have come to expect the short-end of the stick in the 233rd District Court and Haddock’s loathing was neither shocking nor unexpected. Judge Haddock’s misandry crossed several boundaries and reflected poorly on Judge Harris and the 233rd. Comments to litigants like, “See this robe, it is magic . . . it can make people do anything,” are standard fare in the Haddock courtroom and typify her egotistical courtroom demeanor. Judge Haddock’s comments to Veterans with regard to her position on prolonged deployments and their impact on the family are shocking. Haddock commented, “I don’t care about your medals, I don’t care about your service and I will not hear it as an excuse in my court.” This distain for the impact of Service in the War on Terror is antithetical to Family values and demeans the impact of military service on the family. Haddock strongly infers if you can’t afford an attorney you don’t have a voice in my court; discouraging commentary for the multitude of Fathers financially crippled by divorce.

Haddock is a person who, by virtue of her position, can manifest an enormous ego and pronounce astoundingly erroneous judgment on men who must cower to her or be further removed from the children they love.