Hon. Carole W. Clark See Rating Details
Judge
District Court
Smith County
321st
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Carole W. Clark


Comments


Other

Comment #: TX1125
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge was so rude. She accused the defendant of using drugs when he did not/does not. She is intimidating to members of public audience. She is catty and biased. She hid evidence from the public. She covers bad acts of other courtroom players. She is gouging tax payers. She should have been removed from bench long ago.She damages people and seems to take pride in doing so.

Court Staff

Comment #: TX703
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge is an activist man-hater that allows her bias to be openly exploited by attorneys in her court. Texas fathers are not treated fairly and her behavior and decisions are irrational and emotional. She should be removed from the bench for the safety and well being of East Texas families, especially children.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: TX43
Rating:1.9
Comments:
She has bipolar disorder and should be removed from office.