Hon. Nancy L. Berger See Rating Details
Judge
District Court
Tarrant County
322nd
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Nancy L. Berger


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: TX303
Rating:1.2
Comments:
This judge is horrible. She has the emotional control of a spoiled two-year-old. She doesn't abide by the state law or the federal law and she is a miserable excuse for justice.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: TX250
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge boasts on her website about reducing the number of social studies, yet then you put children in unsafe environments because they are not evaluated by a third party. Where the real story and the child's voice can be heard from a trained evaluator.
The Judge is not trained and experienced in assessment of children. Yes, she is a parent and grandparent, which is great, but she seems to forget the imporatance of both parents having and maintaining a meaningful relationship with the child. Love to children is spelled T-I-M-E. If your time allowed to be with your child is stripped by the court, with no reason. Even the other parent says you are a good parent, but unwilling to allow you to see the child outside of your designated 33% because of control issues.

Litigant

Comment #: TX245
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is a joke! She is ill equipped to serve the public. Next time their is a vote everyone who has experienced her incompetence should picket outside the polls!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: TX244
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I will have to say, the appointment of Judge Munford shows the need for review of this election.