Hon. Patrice McDonald See Rating Details
Judge
County Court
Montgomery County
none
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Patrice McDonald


Comments


Other

Comment #: TX1020
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Have another hearing with her very soon. The first hearing with her she took Mothers word with no evidence and refused to take ANY evidence from me. Made me pay money he didn’t have, and approved $6,000 in medical bills from Mother than she couldn’t provide proof for.
Ended up paying $400 more in child support per month based off of overtime, and had arrears equaling $13,000.
GET HER OUT.

Other

Comment #: TX937
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She should be disbarred. Disgraceful!

Litigant

Comment #: TX849
Rating:5.0
Comments:
Not terrible. I think she tries to be fair, but still has old-fashioned views on child custody. Largely ignores bias against fathers in family court. May be time to retire and allow her associate judge to take over, she seems much more willing to look at the entire case.

Litigant

Comment #: TX682
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Extreme bias for female petitioner. Took inordinate amount of time to render final decision.