Hon. Beth Poulos
Associate Judge
District Court
Tarrant County

Rate a judge
Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 14 rating(s)

General Rating Criteria

* Temp. Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Sch. Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Indu. Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Comp. Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punct. Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* Ab-Pr. General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* Ab-Tr. General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flex Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cr. Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Bail General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Plea Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
Inc.-Pr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-Tr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-S. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cv. Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Settle Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
Inc. General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

General Rating Criteria

Criminal Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Civil Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Criminal Defense Lawyer2828607/23/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer2747106/15/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer1985002/01/2013        
Civil Litigation - Private1820010/24/2012        
Category Average          
28286   0.0
27471   0.0
19850   0.0
18200   0.0

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

Non-attorney Rating
(if applicable)

Litigant2854308/02/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2849807/31/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2849707/31/201410309  Read Comment
Litigant2846907/30/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2838107/28/201410309  Read Comment
Litigant2836207/26/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2833607/25/201410309  Read Comment
Litigant2798707/09/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2773806/30/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2759606/23/201410309  Read Comment
Litigant2759506/23/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2747006/15/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2737806/10/20141030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2669904/30/201410309  Read Comment
Other2402711/03/20131030911.0Read Comment
Litigant2402511/02/20131030911.0Read Comment
Other2189206/03/20131030911.0Read Comment
Other2112704/19/201310309  Read Comment
Other2112304/19/201310309  Read Comment
Other1922012/23/201210309  Read Comment
Other1799210/15/20121030911.0Read Comment
Litigant1643507/25/20121030911.0Read Comment
Category Average   1.01.0