Hon. John Chun See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. John Chun


Comments


Other

Comment #: WA1502
Rating:1.0
Comments:
IMO, dishonorable John Chun makes false findings in matters of Restraining Orders. He blocks video evidence that disproves the accusations of other King County employees who falsify court documents to abuse people with restraining orders. It's a disgusting scam where felons' records are expunged if they target other citizens with anti-harassment orders to make them move away from neighborhoods when their rights to speech and movement around the neighborhood are repeatedly taken away via false restraining orders. Chun and District Court Judge Anne Harper willingly participate in this scheme to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights and to criminalize their constitutionally protected behaviors (via arrests for violations of court orders).
It's the same thing confederate judges employed to abuse and control people who were acting within their rights to vote and attend desegregated schools.
D I S G U S T I N G !