"The Robing Room: WA State Judges

Hon. Millie M. Judge	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Snohomish County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 4.8 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 5.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Millie M. Judge

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1952
Rating:1.1

Comments:
Totally incompetent judge. I spoke with other judges about her and they agreed that she is in over her head. Should never been put on bench. Misread pleadings and when her mistake was pointed out to her, she ignored the proof. Do not go in front of her.

Litigant

Comment #: WA1696
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I did not know that judges lie and cheat people from the bench until I was in the receiving end in a trial in front of her.She does not go by evidence, she is an activist judge who goes by her whim. Also has minimum regard for law , court rules, truth. She should be doing social work or should be out in the street, shouting and hollering with a cardboard sign and selling pencils from a cup or something along that line, not at the judge's bench.

Litigant

Comment #: WA1695
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I did not know that judges lie and cheat people from the bench until I was in the receiving end in a trial in front of her.She does not go by evidence, she is an activist judge who goes by her whim. Also has minimum regard for law , court rules, truth. She should be doing social work or should be out in the street, shouting and hollering with a cardboard sign and selling pencils from a cup or something along that line, not at the judge's bench.

Litigant

Comment #: WA838
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Handled an extremely contentious and complex divorce trial without showing bias, and showed exceptional insight and clarity in her opinion.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA829
Rating:8.6

Comments:
Very fair, intelligent and reasonable. Thoughtful judge with a good grasp of evidence and the issues.