Hon. Rachelle E. Anderson See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
Spokane County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.4 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Rachelle E. Anderson


Comments


Other

Comment #: WA2048
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Anderson hasn't finished ruling on our case yet, but I was definitely overly dramatic all the way up to trial while expressing my frustrations and she appeared to empathize with the challenges I was faced with. I don't really think she will rule in favor of my position, but I do feel better knowing that she listens and that she helped redirect me back on topic when I started to wander. If she rules against my position or puts forth punitive measures, then I'll have no one to blame but myself. I'm just glad this last two years is wrapping up and I'm relieved that I was still able to have my concerns heard regardless of my frustration. I had the wrong impression of Judge Anderson and I owe her an apology.

Other

Comment #: WA1658
Rating:10.0
Comments:
While I did not win my case, I feel that Judge Anderson was prepared and did a great job. I am sure the person who gave 1 star clearly lost and i am sure she sees a lot of less than desirable people, so that is to be expected, I am sure. I am glad she is tough on some of these parents who are not always honest or truthful.

Other

Comment #: WA1506
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Had not read through files before hand. Had no recollection of evidence turned in, had to be directed several times to page/location of where evidence/pics were. Tossed out evidence from CPS. Seemed to not care about child's well being, rather other parties crying. Would roll her eyes almost non-stop and sigh very loudly.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA912
Rating:9.4
Comments:
Was fully prepared for the case and understood the implications of custodial interference. Supports equal parenting rights. Handled an argumentative, pouting lawyer with mastery.