Hon. Jerri G. Potts See Rating Details
Superior Court
Franklin County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Jerri G. Potts


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1473
She no longer handles the family law docket for Franklin County. Assigned to the "dependency docket," on the theory that involves only people too poor to matter, abused and neglected children and indigent unfit parents. So what harm can she do? No one will care until a child dies, if children haven't already died due to her rulings. An agenda to give children back to abusive, criminal parents, no matter what. The Superior Court judges are the employer of this irresponsible person, who has no legal skills at all, and they must bear the consequences. Until a child or children die at her hands, it will all be covered up, perhaps even when that happens. It will be too late then to bring a dead child back, and is too late to spare them the abuse they suffer from being forced to be with the parents who assault them.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1269
Unknowledgeable, biased, a pretender.