Hon. Charles R. Snyder See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Whatcom County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Charles R. Snyder


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1838
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Everything said in these posts are true.

Other

Comment #: WA1837
Rating:2.0
Comments:
He was a hack who bent the law in favor of the result he wanted. I witnessed a case where the lawyers came to an agreement on certain findings, which Snyder accepted. But then I found out his Conclusions of Law were based on the opposite of what the findings stated! Unbelievable! Some day he’ll read this post. Snyder, you’re an ass, we all felt it, we all knew it, but didn’t say anything because we couldn’t. Now that you’re retired, me and the rest of the citizens (and lawyers), of Whatcom County can finally tell it like it was. You’re an idiot.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1754
Rating:4.4
Comments:
He seems like a nice guy but he clearly had a favorite before our trial began. The actual evidence didn't seem important to him so much as rendering a decision for whom he favored beforehand. One of the worst judges as far as considering the evidence and rendering a fair decision that I've ever appeared before in 35 years as a lawyer. Thank God he's now retired.

Litigant

Comment #: WA883
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Law means nothing to this man. He will ignore the law for the better story from someone he favors. He has no good heart thought for the one he does not favor. I thought it was a requirement that Judges know and uphold the law of Washington state and our constitution
not so in Whatcom county. They make up their own

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA653
Rating:1.4
Comments:
I agree with the above comment that Judge Snyder is prejudiced and biased. That is my opinion also. Furthermore, he will select certain facts and make a big deal out of them to support his decision, but he will ignore other more persuasive facts just to make justifying his pre-chosen outcome a little easier for him.

Other

Comment #: WA652
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Charles Snyder is prejudiced, biased, and can't keep his facts straight, even after he told us at trial what his notes showed and then we took time on the record to clarify the record and his notes. He's an idiot. See: www.dishonorablejudgesnyder.com.