Hon. Susan J. Craighead See Rating Details
Presiding Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Susan J. Craighead


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA694
Rating:8.6
Comments:
She handled a very complex landlord-tenant dispute. She seemed to understand the legal issues. She declined to rule on most of the issues prior to trial, which created much more work for all parties. (Both parties should have been able to narrow the issues through their respective motions for summary judgment). But, all in all, she handled it fairly.

Litigant

Comment #: WA459
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Craighead took almost 3 months to decide a summary judgment motion. The matters were complex and she clearly didn't get it! When she finally ruled, she simply signed the moving party's motion, a deficeint order in and of itself, with no explanation.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA261
Rating:3.5
Comments:
Judge Craighead has no civil trial background and it shows. She is smart. But she cannot handle a courtroom and has no understanding about civil discovery. This is not sour grapes. She is bad.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA230
Rating:8.9
Comments:
Judge Craighead presided over a difficult and very emotional family law trial last year. Her preparation was thorough; she treated everyone in her courtroom with respect and was very sharp on both the law and evidence. She gave her ruling promptly and compassionately. I was extremely impressed by her in all respects.