Hon. Richard D. Eadie See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.7 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Richard D. Eadie


Comments


Other

Comment #: WA651
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge failed to admit key testimony, and pronounced an excessively harsh sentence, in spite of massive community support for a reduced sentence. He was overly moralistic, and caved to the political whims of the prosecution.

Litigant

Comment #: WA414
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Eadie is terrible. He should have recused himself from a case in which we are defendants -- due to conflict of interest. Instead, he remained silent and has issued a series of illogical and unjust rulings and ruined our case -- he has ensured the jury will not hear the facts and the party he favors will win.

For more details, read our recusal motion at mhdecoursey.com, Dkt. 196, filed on 8/9/2012.

Some details:
We were involved in a lawsuit against Windermere Real Estate from 2006 through 2011. While that case was still in the Seattle courthouse, we dismissed our attorneys (Lane Powell) for improper conduct and carving up the judgment to Windermere's advantage. The law firm sued us and the case was assigned to Judge Eadie. That suit has been going on now for about 11 months.

We have recently learned that Judge Eadie's wife is a Windermere Real Estate Broker. According to the Public Disclosure Commission, the Eadie family has received more than $289,000 in Windermere Commissions in the last 9 years, and possibly twice that much, given the PDC's range method of reporting income.

In all that time, with hundreds of mentions of Windermere in the pleadings and motions, Judge Eadie has not recused himself. His close affiliation with the controversial company has been a closely guarded secret. He has denied every one of our motions and granted all of our opponents', save one. He has recently dismissed all our counterclaims and defenses.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA211
Rating:8.8
Comments:
I had an oral arg before Judge Eadie; an appeal of an administrative decision. He was laid back (even though opposing counsel was 25 mins late), he had read both briefs, and had a comprehensive knowledge of the record. I was impressed by his professionalism and preparedness. He decided in our favor and seemed to be interested in worker's rights.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA188
Rating:1.2
Comments:
In family law, deeply religious and moralistic to the point of ignoring the law. Any hint of living in sin or otherwise not following a conservative religious lifestyle and that party is doomed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA180
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Eadie's decision in one matter in particular completely defied logic, law, convention. Did he owe someone a favor? There is no way decent people can defend against what Judge Eadie rules in favor of. Judge Eadie's justice must be an indication or projection of his own internal standards or values, that is the only explanation for why he rules in favor of the wrongdoers.