Hon. James D. Cayce See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.7 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. James D. Cayce


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1208
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Does not appear to understand motions practice or the standards for setting aside a judgment

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA892
Rating:10.0
Comments:
He's the only judge I have faced who gave me a standing chance to be a great dad. He saw through my ex's BS. He was the only judge who didn't make a ruling favoring her based on her unproven allegations whereas the other 6 or 7 judges have. I would back this judge even if I was in the wrong, because I believe he rules based on true law as intended. He is one of the few I have seen that is not corrupt. I have lost faith in the justice system because of the others in such great abundance who sell out for generation of cash flow to the court system. The justice system needs more honorable judges like this guy---Honorable Judge Cayce.