Hon. Theresa B. Doyle See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Theresa B. Doyle


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA1504
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge has a SERIOUS bias when ruling on a case presented before her. Even though the GAL in our case had perjured himself through lies related to the child involved, it was as if she was only interested in one side of the hearing, and was unable to see through the lies that were presented. Rather than making a poor ruling, she should have at least set the matter for trial. Now we are stuck with an awful ruling that provides no benefit to the child involved in the matter.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA596
Rating:1.3
Comments:
This judge does not understand legal concepts, but she makes up for it by being surly and dismissive. She will not listen to counsel and her rulings are nonsensical. Other than that, she's awful.