Hon. Rebekah Zinn See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
Thurston County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.2 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Rebekah Zinn


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA1117
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Trying to be fairer to Zinn that she was to me, Thurston Co Housing Court is one sick turkey! It is exclusively about money, NOTHING about tenant's rights. NO GROUNDS OR RESOURCES for Tenant's to obtain redress for Harassment or Discrimination.

Zinn always finds for the Landlord. Doesn't give a hoot if the Landlord or Landlor's attorney offers PERJURED TESTIMONY, as was the case with me. Only time I ever lose a case is when the opposing party COMMITS PERJURY. Those lies are now ON THE RECORD. DISGUSTING!
She ordered an eviction, in a ruling that has more holes than a colander or plate of swiss cheese.
She's calmer and less bizarre than Indu Thomas, her sister Commissioner i Family Court, who not only accepts perjurious testimony, and refuses substantiated rebuttals, but makes it herself!
The problem with the Commissioners in Thurston County, is that they seem to be patronage appointments or 'favor' appointments, or possibly even BOUGHT appointments.
As a woman I am embarrassed by the low level of professionalism shown by the female 'Commissioners' - oh heck, let's throw in Lack as well.

The Commissioners are a DISASTER for the people of Thurston County. The Housing Court is a MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO HOMELESSNESS, and a SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL INJUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE OF WASHINGTON STATE.
At least Zinn had the grace to balance the egregiousness of the eviction ruling with a denial of an egregious claim by the Landlord's perjurious attorney. He has called a higher Judgement onto himself.