Hon. Bernard F. Veljacic See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Clark County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Bernard F. Veljacic


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1793
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I have had a number of family law cases in front of J. Veljacic. Representing men and women, he is prepared and completely fair. There are numerous judge and commissioners that make you feel as though you are rolling the dice. Never with this Judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1452
Rating:4.8
Comments:
Doesn’t seem to care about local rules for filing deadlines. Let other side make arguments from response motions served 4 days late and awarded fees for drafting one of the tardy motions.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1309
Rating:1.3
Comments:
This so-called Judge is sexist and extremely abusive. Beware before going before him--he is a political hack and does not know the law, nor does he apply the law even-handedly. Best advice is to try and find a different Judge.