Hon. Julie M. McKay See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
Spokane County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Julie M. McKay


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: WA1739
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Misconduct, derision, intimidation. Barring testimony that could have reduced offenses by a community predator recently arrested yet again, barring of testimony both allowed the court to side, enforce continued stalking and child abuses. It rather aided in gross abuses, effected re victimization, assisted as a legal weapon to avert accountability for Domestic Violence and Parental Custody Interference. The equivalent listening and interpretation of accounting of describing an orange thusly produced an impression that she wanted to hear about bananas, and upon attempted recital of difference to correct presumed misstatement, one is punished for interrupting her strawberry fields forever. The confusion caused implements both fear and immediate derailment of testimony. It is a travesty that it is necessary to denounce one which is assigned such a serious position, yet unhinges the mechanics of justice.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1492
Rating:1.0
Comments:
she has committed acts of extortion and rackateering. Also misconduct and abusive use of power to intimidate

Other

Comment #: WA1329
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Newly appointed judge, and green around the edges, Julie McKay foolishly makes dangerous assumptions based on quick, limited information, and how she feels about people based on appearance or demeanor. She is emotional and condescending when her "authority" is not respected, but has no respect for the common citizen. She is not interested in truth or integrity. This is how judges and lawyers sleep at night. Sadly, McKay places children in harmful situations and uses her backwards, outdated belief systems to justify this. This is a woman severely lacking in perspective, and jaded by the system she is embedded in.