Hon. Cathy Moore See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.3 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Cathy Moore


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: WA2160
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge was so checked out that she retired (hopefully for the rest of her life) within a few months of our case. She did not even allow both sides to present their case. How is that justice? What kind of a judge announces she has decided prior to hearing both sides present? Regardless, she clearly understands she should not be a judge. She was not interested in actual evidence, only in how charismatic the lawyers and litigants present in court. Let's all hope she stays retired for life.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA2001
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge needs to be in prison! She is abrasive and negligent an places children with the inappropriate parents without proper evidence before her. Cathy Moore has placed children (2 an 4) in a halfway house with the father while the mother was accused of not letting the children go see their dad in a halfway house. She has allowed a drunk driver that killed someone to only get six months of community service. She fraudulently told people she was a judge when she was never one prior to her elected position in 2019. Cathy Moore needs to be removed from the bench.
Her erratic behavior shows the fraudulent judge to be on the bench an decided matters that results in matters that are beyond her comprehension. I feel bad for the families that lose their family members because of this damaged judge’s decisions!

[Redacted by Ed.]

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1982
Rating:10.0
Comments:
People tend to rate when dissatisfied. I know who two of the ratings are from on here “Teenage Lives Matter” and the posting the night before… this is a mother who emotionally abused her daughter, sleeps with her attorney, and to this day is under professional supervision because she is truly oblivious to how her lack of parental boundaries is dangerous.
Judge Moore made an emergency decision to immediately place a teenage girl in the care of her father because the mother actions/inaction would have costed a child their life.
The mother who rated Judge Moore on here had EVERY opportunity to rehabilitate herself. She was repeatedly warned to stop and get help…She received warning, after warning, after warning. It’s WA state, for a mother to lose custody of a teenage child… it has to be bad. In this case it was.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA1973
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Arrogant, angry, incompetent. Catherine Moore does not review or read working papers and submissions of fact. Rather, Judge Moore "shoots from the hip" and appears to rule based on whatever preconceived opinion she holds that day.

EVIDENCE DOES NOT MATTER in Judge Moore's court. Don't even bother to bring anything other than a good story - she is unwilling to read or review anything.

More about Moore:

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/politics/article/King-County-Bar-Association-scolds-would-be-10359638.php

Judge Moore’s dullard New Zealander husband: David Baxter

https://pacificalandscapesseattle.com/story/

If you have a legal dispute with Pacifica Landscapes (so many do) stay out of Judge Moore’s Court.

Litigant

Comment #: WA1794
Rating:1.0
Comments:
CATHY MOORE is a horrible and incompetent judge. It is sad that she was elected to sit on the bench and hear matters that have direct rulings that cause irreparable harm/damage to our family and children. If she does not know how to do her job, she should not be on the bench. Remove Moore before she ruins MORE lives! Teenager’s lives matter.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1792
Rating:1.6
Comments:
Judge Moore should not be on the bench. She is impulsive; reacts emotionally to issues and has an inability to recognize when she has made a bad ruling. She ignores evidence and appears to believe that she has an innate gift to decipher what the truth is no matter what the evidence shows. She needs to be removed.