Hon. James E. Rulli See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Clark County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.9 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. James E. Rulli


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA1126
Rating:2.1
Comments:
When my son said "Dad I want to live with you," Rulli turned us into felons. Close-minded, inept, destructive, impervious to reason, ignored wife's admitting she suffers stress related illnesse. Let jean Waller lie again as usual. Ignored Stankhe's favorable ruling, ignored report cards, police reports, medical reports and forced son against his will back in other house.
Ignored provocation at my house, I finally lost it. Puts trashed son back in my custody when it predictably fell apart within 7 months. Came after me for judicial intimidation -Judge Poyfair spoke in my defence but my attorney Steven Sowards covers up Rulli's incompetence to jury and insisted I not testify.

This court utterly trashed my kids and I over 8 years of hell in this inquisition, kangaroo court that is unnaccountable, does not enforce the law, and can come after anyone they want. The new America, folks. now, you see it everywhere. They are a disgrace as people and there's no one to turn for help.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA1079
Rating:3.8
Comments:
I would agree with the previous comment. He is a gender-biased judge. If you are a male seeking custody or at least fair visitations with your child- forget it. This judge let our son be essentially kidnapped to another state, where we only see him 4 times-a- year. Since then, our son has now been molested by a member of his birth mother's family. Way to go, not-so-Honorable Judge Rulli.

Litigant

Comment #: WA684
Rating:2.0
Comments:
This judge is lazy and gender-biased, and allowed multiple violations of orders without holding a woman in contempt.