Hon. Susan K. Cook See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Skagit County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Susan K. Cook


Comments


Other

Comment #: WA753
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is against local farmers. Forcing them to provide housing for migrants and their families. She needs to be replaced with someone who loves their community and supports local businesses. Not someone who favores those who don't represent our community. Remember this when it comes time to vote.

Litigant

Comment #: WA559
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was brought fourth in front of Susan Cook to answer to allegations of Domestic violence Not only were they false this court only gave me 2 days to respond, when I arrived and came time to answer I presented A voice recording and testimony from 3 police agencies stating that my ex had used no contact orders to keep me away from my son and that it appears that this woman shopps around to agency to agency. However Susan Cook did not even lift an eye lash nor look at any evidence,Sheer Laziness,And Administered the no contact order with simply lies being stated.

Litigant

Comment #: WA557
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Me again and This court of Susan cook only gave me Two days to respond to these accusations above, with that being said she didnt even let me diplay my evidence to indicate the allegations were innacurrate and untrue this Woman should be Barred, Tell the truth even if it leads to your death thats my saying Ill take a lie detector test I am not a woman beater this judge is crazy.