Hon. Anne Hirsch See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Thurston County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Anne Hirsch


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA942
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Spellbound by her total disregard of the facts and the law she sworn to uphold. Change is needed in the court system within Thurston county. Let's start with her. Next election let's be sure she is voted out to private practice in some other state.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: WA923
Rating:1.0
Comments:
There are 3 individuals that need to be taken off the bench. Lack, Thomas and her. All three of them rule from personal opinion and the liberal programs that placed them in their positions. Any decisions that come from them will be to support the out of control Liberal mentality that rules the court systems. all three have a regard for the law that they sworn to uphold. They are puppets to DSHS and the liberal machine. Remove them from the bench.