Hon. Michael J. Trickey See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Michael J. Trickey


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: WA214
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This stupid jackass ignored the law and I had to get Court of Appeals to accept Discretionary Review of his grossly incompetent, bigoted ruling. Discretionary Review is hard to obtain, but NOT if C of A has to review the decision of an idiot, god-complex, child abusing egomaniac like Trickey.

He ruled in favor of an abandoning mother, JUST BECAUSE she is a mother. I had cusody of my child for 2 years. The mother disappeared. She came back to court and wanted INCREASED visitation. A commissioner dismissed the case. The mother sought revision by a judge. Trickey came on board and granted adequate cause EVEN THOUGH: (1) the mother did NOT file any working copies to review; (2) the mother abandoned the child; (3) the "change of circumstance" was not even a change. THE MOTHER'S lawyer actually was trying to LOSE ON PURPOSE and did so poorly to ensure a loss. But, Trickey wanted so bad to help a mom (since he's a radical feminist, father- hating, closet homo himself)that he ruled in her favor in a case that her attorney didn't want to fight.

Court of Appeals accepted Disc. Review to fix it. Then mother's attorney official quit the action, instead of fighting and getting exposed in the Reporters.

Psychos like Trickey should go to jail since he gets paid to provide children to abandoning neglectful crackhead abusive parents (so long as they are mothers). He's no better than child slave traders.