Hon. Jacqueline Jeske See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
King County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jacqueline Jeske


Comments


Other

Comment #: WA464
Rating:7.0
Comments:
She reads carefully all the material submitted, listen, observes carefully body reactions during depositions, and has no fear to draw conclusions outside of the "beaten path" to secure justice.
The reason for not giving a 10/10, she is too slow, too many "postponing" just becasue other cases are waiting after 45 minutes. Every postponing costed me a fortune.

Other

Comment #: WA446
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She's horrible. It's too bad she has immunity, if she didn't, I'm sure she'd have been sued and removed by now. I've Witnessed the most bizarre and as far as I'm concerned, criminal behavior that any "judge" has ever handed down to families. She's responsible for much sadness, pain and future public burden.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WA419
Rating:1.3
Comments:
This person makes the entire King County Superior Court look unprofessional. She should be removed, as she does not represent the people of this county, but her own agenda of bias.

Other

Comment #: WA418
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I observe King County Family Courts regularly. I've sat in her court as a court observer. OMG - Could not believe the bias spewed, lack of due process, and ignorance of rules of evidence. This Commissioner should be returned to being an attorney, as she is does not help give this court dignity.

Other

Comment #: WA388
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I can only hope should I find myself in court again, that she will hear my case.

Other

Comment #: WA387
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Contrary to the Litigants statement, this judge is very fair and realistic. She is knowledgeable and thorough. The only reason I can see in this other person being unsatisfied is that they most likely lost their case.

Litigant

Comment #: WA282
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Even as a female litigant it is more than obvious to me that she favors women in the courtroom, but more importantly she imposes harsh and financially impossible burdens on the parties. She is unrealistic and overbearing. She cost us thousands in attorney fees making us wait to be heard, even though all parties were checked in before 8:30 a.m., she didn't hear our case until 12:30. I think she may have had something against our attorney, although he said he rarely practices in King County.