Hon. David P. Greenberg See Rating Details
Special Judge
Court
Jefferson County
23rd Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.3 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. David P. Greenberg


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WV293
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Required a man battling cancer whose drs had notified the court man had cancer and cannot participate to attend all proceedings in divorce/custody case. Appointed a Psychologist to do an eval Dr was sanctioned by VW LICENSING every year for 10 years and was on strictest probation for his biased and terrible evaluations
Criminally prosecuted man for filing discovery. Kept man’s kids away when no evidence, testimony, etc against man. Worst violations of man’s rights. He heavily favors women and their attorneys. All facts and what was done to man was horrific

Other

Comment #: WV291
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Testifies from the bench on behalf of the desired narrative. Will not allow witnesses to appear that would contradict empty allegation. Proffers legal advice to opposing council. And! This is precious. Laughs out loud on the record about how West Virginia laws that don’t support his decision “don’t mean anything”.

Throw this guy out with the trash. Pure trash. He forces lady justice to eat fruit from the poison tree and drink from the poison well, and treats her as if she were the whore of Babylon.

Other

Comment #: WV262
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He should not be allowed any where's near a Family Court. Just like the other comments, he takes his robe off and stands behind females and works with the females attorneys to dismantle a Fathers rights. I am working with my State Senator to have this Judge investigated. My Senator is already aware of Greenberg and we are looking at options right now. Contact your State Senator if you find yourself at Greenbergs injustice.

Litigant

Comment #: WV252
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Has a strong bias towards clients of Cinda Scales (314 W John Street). Judge Greenberg used to practice at that office, and was in a partnership with Cinda Scales husband. Long time law school buddies.

Makes up law as he goes along. Your attorney will sniff this out and realize it’s just a billable hours scam and will exploit you for all you’re worth once they realize they’re going to lose.

Prosecutor

Comment #: WV251
Rating:3.5
Comments:
Poor decision making skills, Doesn't know/understand WV family court cases and precedent. Is SUPER biased towards the female respondent or petitioner. Do NOT get in front of this judge with an adultery case in a divorce. He will clean your clock and take your money and basically give it to the Female in front of him.