Hon. Edward F. Vlack See Rating Details
Circuit Court Judge
Circuit Court
St. Croix County
Tenth Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Edward F. Vlack



Comment #: WI346
This guy is a criminal pure and simple. He has allowed my children to suffer from abuse. Since December of 2014 He has been required by law to disqualify himself from this case but has refused, he is also on record telling me that he will not be disqualifying himself either. He needs to be behind bars not a bench.


Comment #: WI329
He is arrogant, has no morals or common sense, and lacks the basic concept of right and wrong. Oh I almost forgot, he is a liar as well.


Comment #: WI318
Rating:Not Rated
Not only was his decision unfair, he blatantly decided to not adequately explain his decision to award maintenance, equalization, or child support to someone who clearly didn't need it. In Time based on his decision, I will be filing bankruptcy simply because he is incapable of seeing an overall financial picture. How this man has been able to retain a position as a judge is beyond me.